Trump’s Crypto Advances at Risk from Bank Secrecy Act Compliance Issues & Regulations

2 min read

The Bank Secrecy Act Regime Threatens Trump’s Crypto Progress

Trump’s Early Actions Favoring Cryptocurrency

In a notable shift for the cryptocurrency landscape, President Donald Trump has begun his administration on a positive note for the sector, contrasting sharply with the previous administration’s stance. During his campaign, Trump aimed to be the first “crypto president,” and his initial actions reflect a commitment to this vision. Under the Biden administration, the Securities and Exchange Commission and federal banking authorities imposed stringent regulations that often sidelined industry players, creating a climate of high compliance risk. On January 23, Trump took a significant step by signing an executive order aimed at enhancing U.S. leadership in digital assets and financial technology, while also safeguarding economic freedoms. This order emphasizes individuals’ rights to engage in transactions without unwarranted censorship and to retain control over their digital assets. However, recent developments, such as the establishment of a digital asset reserve fund, have overshadowed this critical aspect of the executive order.

The Challenge of Financial Surveillance

Despite the positive momentum generated by the new administration, a significant obstacle remains: the financial surveillance framework that has been established in the United States. This system hampers individuals’ ability to conduct transactions freely, which is a primary concern acknowledged in the January executive order. It is essential for the administration to collaborate with Congress to address this issue, yet there have been few indications of such efforts thus far. The current surveillance regime stems from the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA) of 1970, which has become increasingly outdated, inefficient, and costly. For instance, in 2023, nearly 300,000 financial institutions submitted around 30 million BSA reports, yet only a small fraction led to prosecutions or investigations, highlighting its ineffectiveness.

Privacy Rights Under Threat

The current financial surveillance system operates under the assumption that everyone is a potential criminal, undermining the fundamental principle of presumption of innocence that underpins the American judicial system. This approach neglects the importance of personal privacy and financial autonomy in a free society. Furthermore, it violates the Fourth Amendment rights of Americans, which generally requires law enforcement to obtain a warrant based on probable cause to access an individual’s personal information. However, this protection is bypassed when individuals transact through third parties like banks, leaving their financial records vulnerable.

Need for BSA Reform

The BSA’s controversial nature has only intensified over the years, with Congress and various federal agencies expanding its reach. As Justice Neil Gorsuch pointed out in a dissenting opinion in 2018, the requirement to share information with a third party does not mean individuals should forfeit their Fourth Amendment rights. While the Supreme Court may be hesitant to revisit the BSA, Congress has the power to amend it to protect citizens’ privacy. By maintaining record-keeping requirements but removing mandatory reporting, lawmakers could ensure that law enforcement only accesses these records with proper warrants, thus upholding constitutional protections.

Congressional Efforts to Safeguard Privacy

Some Congressional members are actively working to rectify the shortcomings of the BSA. For example, Representative John Rose (R-TN) has introduced the Bank Privacy Reform Act, which aims to reinforce Fourth Amendment protections for Americans. Additionally, Senator Mike Lee (R-UT) has proposed similar legislation called the Saving Privacy Act. However, the Senate Banking Committee has yet to propose comparable measures, particularly amidst ongoing criticisms of the crypto sector from figures like Senator Elizabeth Warren. Nonetheless, Senator Lee’s initiative is commendable, as it seeks to restore the balance between law enforcement needs and citizens’ privacy rights, which is essential for promoting U.S. leadership in the digital asset space.